Yesterday's NY Times op-ed page had a
fantastic piece by Thomas Frank, the guy who wrote "What's the Matter with Kansas?"
At surface level, the column was about how voters in Kansas rejected some ultraconservative members of the state board of education - but the conservative movement is still alive.
But the most important part of the piece came about halfway in - a crystallization of the real motivation for so many people who think they are conservative. He writes:
"The culture war ... is larger than any of its leaders, larger than its legion of citizen-activists, larger even than the particular causes in which these forces are enlisted. Seen from the streets of Wichita, the rightist rebellion of Kansas seems to fulfill that most romantic of American political traditions: the uprising of the little guy." It explains a phenomenon I've marveled at for years: How has the conservative movement convinced so many people, like small business owners, farmers, and blue-collar workers to vote for candidates and issues that will actually hurt that specific voter?
Frank's one paragraph hits it on the head: Americans have always had a soft spot for the little guy. And for little guys like small businesspersons, farmers, and factory workers, the past 20 years have been positively brutal: First, it was the Japanese car companies. Then it was the Wal-Mart revolution that bankrupted small businesses across the nation. Then it was the factory farm movement of the past 15 years. While social liberals have picked at small, marginally relevant pieces of the puzzle ("Unionize Wal-Mart!" "Buy Union!" "Eat Vegetarian!"), conservatives have scrapped the entire frame of reference and focused on things completely unrelated that
make the little guy feel like he is part of something bigger than himself. When's the last time you heard a conservative say anything about Wal-Mart? When's the last time a conservative congressperson passed legislation that addressed the specific needs of family farmers that didn't have the effect of making factory farms even stronger?
You don't. Instead, you get stem-cell research. School prayer. Charter schools. A flag-burning amendment. Gay marriage amendments. Attacks on the 'liberal media.' Weakening environmental regulations.
As Frank points out, in almost every issue conservatives argue against the combined forces of logic, research, and experts - the ultimate triumph of the "little guy." You'll almost never hear a conservative argument that cites "the bulk of scientific research is on our side" or "the law is clear on this matter," because their specific appeal is to the "wisdom of the common man."
It's all ingenius, and the strategy's as old as the hills. This "conservative" ideology is really the direct descendent of the hare-brained populism of William Jennings Bryan, Huey Long, and George Wallace. You can even find shades of Machiavelli - creating an enemy in "expertise" in order to consolidate your power among those who could eat you for lunch, and thereby make yourself (or your movement) the final arbiter of all societal decisions.
What I wonder is this: Where does one go to find actual conservative ideas today? For those of us who believe in a free market of consumer & industrial goods, balanced budgets, rational security choices, and a government whose authority stops at our doorsteps, where shall we send our loyalties?